Today's hottest deals

Asus G73Jw

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.92% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive20.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
SystemAsus G73Jw  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G73Jw
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100805
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '16 at 05:08
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 740-$190
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 94.9
1-Core 73.4
2-Core 126
62% 98.1 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 249
26% 211 Pts
64-Core 256
16% 256 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460M
Asus(1043 2042) 1.5GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5354
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
6.92% Terrible
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 9.54
Parallax 6.66
6% 7.96 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 8.63
Splatting 10.6
8% 9.91 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.92%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ VERTEX2 40GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.23 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
20.7% Poor
Read 137
Write 45.4
Mixed 71.5
18% 84.8 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 27.4
4K Mixed 6.96
40% 15.1 MB/s
DQ Read 10.3
DQ Write 21.3
DQ Mixed 4.67
7% 12.1 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 41%
TOSHIBA MK2552GSX 250GB
227GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 27.1
Write 20.1
Mixed 13.3
24% 20.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.18
4K Mixed 0.27
51% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
41.7% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 13.3
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 10.7
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 57.5
70% 57.5 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G73Jw Builds (Compare 101 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G73Jw

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $225
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback