Today's hottest deals

Asus M51BC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics40.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus M51BC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M51BC
Memory8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130805
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '18 at 23:22
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8300-$168
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 89.5
1-Core 59.7
2-Core 111
56% 86.7 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 354
34% 279 Pts
64-Core 361
22% 361 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.1.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
40.6% Average
Lighting 53.3
Reflection 35.6
Parallax 65.1
43% 51.3 fps
MRender 33.1
Gravity 51.5
Splatting 43.1
35% 42.6 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 476
Write 373
Mixed 401
93% 416 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 53.2
4K Mixed 36.3
131% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 95.1
DQ Mixed 52.4
58% 99.4 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 134%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$54
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OABS0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 160
Mixed 162
123% 164 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.17
85% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AO2L16BC8R2-BR2S AO2L16BC4R1-BR1S 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
46.9% Average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 15.4
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 12.9
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M51BC Builds (Compare 122 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus M51BC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $308
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback