Gigabyte GA-F2A75M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics9.62% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive65.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A75M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '18 at 13:59
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 66%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 740K
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
30.6% Below average
Memory 35.9
1-Core 53.7
2-Core 99.5
35% 63 Pts
4-Core 143
8-Core 162
20% 153 Pts
64-Core 157
10% 157 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Asus(1043 83C2) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.71
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
9.62% Terrible
Lighting 10.8
Reflection 12.6
Parallax 9.09
9% 10.8 fps
MRender 15
Gravity 11.2
Splatting 14.7
11% 13.6 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.62%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba Q300 Pro 256GB-$149
238GB free
Firmware: JURA0101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 489
Write 444
Mixed 480
105% 471 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 50.5
4K Mixed 29.6
96% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 98.2
DQ Mixed 47.7
53% 89.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 102%
SanDisk Extreme Pro 240GB-$79
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X21200RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 418
Write 390
Mixed 428
92% 412 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 45.3
4K Mixed 13.9
77% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 26.7
DQ Write 71.6
DQ Mixed 14
21% 37.4 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5471-017.A 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
MC Read 6.4
MC Write 3.6
MC Mixed 5.6
15% 5.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 6.2
17% 5.97 GB/s
Latency 222
18% 222 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A75M-D3H Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A75M-D3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback