Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20349

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 87% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20349  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo Y50-70 Touch
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140818
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '18 at 23:19
Run Duration100 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%
CPU Throttled 87%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Memory 69.5
1-Core 64.3
2-Core 134
53% 89.2 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 325
36% 284 Pts
64-Core 373
23% 373 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3978) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
1.77% Terrible
Lighting 1.73
Reflection 13.5
Parallax 2.66
1% 5.96 fps
MRender 4.19
Gravity 1.13
Splatting 3.61
2% 2.98 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.77%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN1T0HMJP-00000 1TB
733GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV0100Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 484
Write 475
Mixed 495
108% 485 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 25.1
4K Mixed 18.8
72% 22.2 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 15.1
60% 133 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
41.9% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 15.7
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 6.6
16% 5.77 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20349 Builds (Compare 348 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback