Acer AOD255

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive27.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer AOD255  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer AOD255
Memory0.2 GB free of 1 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit kleuren, 1024 x 600 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100812
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '16 at 17:08
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N450
CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Memory 33
1-Core 4.5
2-Core 9
13% 15.5 Pts
4-Core 8.4
8-Core 10.9
1% 9.65 Pts
64-Core 11
1% 11 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.4% Poor
Read 246
Write 100
Mixed 114
34% 154 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 10
4K Mixed 9.29
34% 10.2 MB/s
DQ Read 25.7
DQ Write 14.3
DQ Mixed 8.21
9% 16.1 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
AD 48594D503131325336344350362D53362020 1x1GB
1 of 1 slots used
1GB SODIMM DDR2 667 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
4.78% Terrible
MC Read 1.4
MC Write 1.2
MC Mixed 1.9
4% 1.5 GB/s
SC Read 0.3
SC Write 0.4
SC Mixed 0.2
1% 0.3 GB/s
Latency 238
17% 238 ns
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.78%
Great: 10%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $44SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback