Asus Z9PE-D16 Series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics79.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus Z9PE-D16 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z9PE-D16 Series
Memory30 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150611
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '18 at 15:34
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-4650 0
Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 84
1-Core 85.9
2-Core 172
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 615
55% 466 Pts
64-Core 1,569
97% 1,569 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Asus(1043 855C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1316 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.8% Very good
Lighting 103
Reflection 102
Parallax 94
84% 99.6 fps
MRender 88.2
Gravity 93.7
Splatting 81.4
71% 87.8 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$22
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 58.01D58 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 61.5
Write 58.5
Mixed 64
46% 61.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.75
4K Mixed 0.38
102% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 59%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
245GB free, PID a00a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 30
Write 25.8
Mixed 27.6
35% 27.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.57
4K Mixed 0.19
61% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351R7CFR8C-P 8x4GB
8 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.8% Above average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 37.4
MC Mixed 13.3
63% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 4.3
17% 5.83 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z9PE-D16 Series Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

System: Asus Z9PE-D16 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $314
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback