Biostar TP67XE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar TP67XE  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110221
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '18 at 10:09
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 92.3
1-Core 95.2
2-Core 185
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 357
48% 358 Pts
64-Core 359
22% 359 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 77%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Lighting 72.3
Reflection 76
Parallax 71.9
59% 73.4 fps
MRender 68.6
Gravity 66.7
Splatting 67
55% 67.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$190
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: MN6OA580 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
87% Excellent
Read 155
Write 148
Mixed 108
102% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.03
4K Mixed 0.35
102% 1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 87%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
154GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 102
Write 87.9
Mixed 77.8
67% 89.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.22
67% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-125.A01LF 9905403-125.A01LF 9905403-125.A01LF 9905403-125.A01LF 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.6% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 16.4
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.1
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TP67XE Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Biostar TP67XE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $429
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback