Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	8.07% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	41.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3740QM-$220 14,369 User benchmarks, average bench 64% Onboard, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	69.2% Good	Memory 83.9 1-Core 90.8 2-Core 170 68% 115 Pts	4-Core 295 8-Core 424 45% 360 Pts	64-Core 479 30% 479 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K3000M 2,310 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Fujitsu(10CF 1760) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8816 Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	8.07% Terrible	Lighting 8.33 Reflection 8.12 Parallax 9.84 7% 8.76 fps	MRender 12.7 Gravity 11.4 Splatting 14.1 11% 12.7 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.07% Great: 8%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE256HMHP-000 256GB 704 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0 Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	41.7% Average	Read 288 Write 30.7 Mixed 71.5 28% 130 MB/s	4K Read 27.9 4K Write 34.1 4K Mixed 5.23 67% 22.4 MB/s	DQ Read 360 DQ Write 82.2 DQ Mixed 18 66% 154 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 2x8GB 8,416 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	54.8% Above average	MC Read 20.9 MC Write 19.1 MC Mixed 17 54% 19 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 16.8 SC Mixed 17.7 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 73.6 54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	16x
Quadro K3000MNvidiaBench 8%, 2,310 samples	6x
Quadro K4000MNvidiaBench 12%, 631 samples	2x

SSD
SKC600512G 512GBKingstonBench 109%, 5,390 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	2x

RAM
HMT325S6CFR8A-PB 4x2GBHynixBench 53%, 12 samples	3x
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 M471B5173DB0-YK0 M471B5173EB0-YK0 16GBSamsungBench 30%, 3 samples	3x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 53%, 1,523 samples	2x

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $100