Today's hottest deals

Biostar TP67B+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics36.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar TP67B+  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110217
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '18 at 21:51
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 92.3
1-Core 89.3
2-Core 180
71% 120 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 359
48% 358 Pts
64-Core 359
22% 359 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 77%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
MSI(1462 2825) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Lighting 44.2
Reflection 39.8
Parallax 53.5
36% 45.8 fps
MRender 54.3
Gravity 50
Splatting 36.9
37% 47.1 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$112
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 373
Write 358
Mixed 342
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 51.6
4K Mixed 19.9
92% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 28.9
DQ Write 99.8
DQ Mixed 20.4
28% 49.7 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 124%
SanDisk SSD 128GB-$84
23GB free
Firmware: 2.0.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22% Poor
Read 217
Write 45.4
Mixed 83
25% 115 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 11.1
4K Mixed 4.45
35% 10.3 MB/s
DQ Read 16.6
DQ Write 10.6
DQ Mixed 3.38
5% 10.2 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 22%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600EL Series 1600EL Series 1600EL Series 1600EL Series 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
52.3% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 16.2
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.6
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TP67B+ Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Biostar TP67B+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $836
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback