Today's hottest deals

Colorful C.A68M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive79.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardColorful C.A68M-E  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '18 at 17:28
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 860K-$51
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Memory 70.9
1-Core 66.7
2-Core 120
52% 85.7 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 188
25% 187 Pts
64-Core 190
12% 190 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Device(7377 0000) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.1
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
7.13% Terrible
Lighting 8.53
Reflection 7.85
Parallax 10.2
7% 8.85 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 10.2
Splatting 7.26
8% 9.39 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.13%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingdian S280 240GB
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0526A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 452
Write 411
Mixed 438
97% 434 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 77.5
4K Mixed 21.4
117% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 29.2
DQ Write 73.5
DQ Mixed 21.9
25% 41.5 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 119%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
354GB free
Firmware: 2AR10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 101
Write 99.5
Mixed 85.7
72% 95.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.67
4K Mixed 0.24
78% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.7% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 8.8
26% 8.93 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 8.3
22% 7.53 GB/s
Latency 99.3
40% 99.3 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C.A68M-E Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Colorful C.A68M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $210
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback