Today's hottest deals

Ztsystem PACUARE09

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics50.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemZtsystem PACUARE09  (all builds)
MotherboardZTSYSTEM AGLAIA
Memory21.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1842 x 1036 - 32 Bit colors, 1842 x 1036 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101101
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '18 at 14:29
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5520
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Memory 60.3
1-Core 54.6
2-Core 114
45% 76.2 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 420
38% 319 Pts
64-Core 559
35% 559 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 376.54
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.8% Above average
Lighting 62.9
Reflection 68.3
Parallax 60.1
51% 63.8 fps
MRender 73.2
Gravity 59.9
Splatting 53.7
50% 62.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.5% Good
Read 265
Write 202
Mixed 218
51% 228 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 43.4
4K Mixed 32.1
110% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 75.9
DQ Mixed 44.7
49% 82.7 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
534GB free
Firmware: CC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 164
Mixed 148
119% 158 MB/s
4K Read 1.17
4K Write 1.32
4K Mixed 0.39
117% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 94%
Great: 112%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
452GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 107
Write 103
Mixed 103
79% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.74
4K Mixed 0.44
108% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 69%
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$42
43GB free
Firmware: 3.CHF Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
21.8% Poor
Read 38.6
Write 37.2
Mixed 36.7
28% 37.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.04
4K Mixed 0.33
75% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 42%
Seagate Backup+ BK 500GB
276GB free, PID a013
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 28.5
Write 26.5
Mixed 8.06
25% 21 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 0.38
4K Mixed 0.23
23% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 18 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
49.8% Average
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 21.5
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 5.8
16% 5.6 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PACUARE09 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Ztsystem PACUARE09

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback