Today's hottest deals

Apple iMac15,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics27.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemApple iMac15,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-FA842E06C61E91C5
Memory29.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170808
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 03 '18 at 19:23
Run Duration91 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Memory 82.1
1-Core 129
2-Core 240
84% 150 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 545
64% 498 Pts
64-Core 533
33% 533 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RADEON R9 M295X
Apple(106B 013A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 1362 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.6
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.1% Poor
Lighting 35.1
Reflection 38.7
Parallax 38
29% 37.3 fps
MRender 35.5
Gravity 26.2
Splatting 27.7
24% 29.8 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 32%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$23
317GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP14 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 137
Write 136
Mixed 119
98% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.27
4K Mixed 0.14
61% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x484D54343147533641465238412D50422020 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
57.5% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 16.6
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 21.3
56% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac15,1 Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Apple iMac15,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $348
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback