Today's hottest deals

Biostar TP75

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardBiostar TP75  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120706
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 04 '18 at 18:07
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 105
2-Core 210
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 398
53% 395 Pts
64-Core 400
25% 400 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Nvidia(10DE 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 775 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
4.03% Terrible
Lighting 4.93
Reflection 5.88
Parallax 4.25
4% 5.02 fps
MRender 7.19
Gravity 5.07
Splatting 3.39
4% 5.22 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.03%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Drevo X1 SSD 120GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0831C0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 377
Write 286
Mixed 324
73% 329 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 68.4
4K Mixed 3.38
72% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 21.9
DQ Write 57.6
DQ Mixed 3.32
13% 27.6 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 91%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
398GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 116
Write 112
Mixed 108
84% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 0.45
108% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6J1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
34.1% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 9.6
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 11
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TP75 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Biostar TP75

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $516
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback