Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	35.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	Memory 88.6 1-Core 85.7 2-Core 167 68% 114 Pts	4-Core 326 8-Core 338 44% 332 Pts	64-Core 320 20% 320 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 70%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4352 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1899 (B1) Unknown 87 87 459 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 42 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 307 (F1) Unknown 99 99 36235037958	35.4% Below average	Read 230 Write 166 Mixed 199 44% 198 MB/s	4K Read 14.5 4K Write 31.7 4K Mixed 9.3 51% 18.5 MB/s	DQ Read 17.6 DQ Write 38.5 DQ Mixed 9.66 13% 21.9 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C8 2x2GB 113 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27.5% Poor	MC Read 9.1 MC Write 8.8 MC Mixed 8.1 25% 8.67 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 9.2 SC Mixed 8.7 22% 7.57 GB/s	Latency 68.9 58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	6x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	5x
GTX 650 Ti BoostNvidia $140Bench 17%, 15,701 samples	2x

SSD
Ultra II 240GBSanDisk $40Bench 82%, 53,931 samples	2x
X300 256GBSanDisk $99Bench 79%, 2,341 samples	2x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	2x

RAM
9905471-001.A01LF 99U5474-012.A00LF 99U5474-015.A00LF 6GBKingstonBench 45%, 5 samples	5x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	2x
CMX16GX3M2A1333C9 GR1600D364L11S/4G CMX16GX3M2A1333C9 GR1600D364L11S/4G 24GBCorsairBench 49%, 3 samples	2x

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $349