Lenovo 20240

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20240  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo G505
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131204
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 12 '18 at 02:25
Run Duration104 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-5200 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Memory 54.6
1-Core 30.9
2-Core 62.3
32% 49.3 Pts
4-Core 97.5
8-Core 111
14% 104 Pts
64-Core 114
7% 114 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8400 Graphics
Legend(17AA 3802) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1045.0
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.87% Terrible
Lighting 2.13
Reflection 4.42
Parallax 2.84
2% 3.13 fps
MRender 2.67
Gravity 1.93
Splatting 3.04
2% 2.55 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.87%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
419GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR20002 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 96
Write 91.7
Mixed 92.8
70% 93.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.69
4K Mixed 0.24
76% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 RMT3170EB68F9W1600 8GB
667, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.9% Very poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 6.2
17% 6 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 5.1
14% 4.77 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20240 Builds (Compare 76 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $52
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback