Today's hottest deals

Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics48.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 15 '18 at 15:44
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8300-$168
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 88.6
1-Core 62.6
2-Core 127
58% 92.8 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 394
38% 316 Pts
64-Core 387
24% 387 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$131
Asus(1043 0525) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.3.2
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.3% Average
Lighting 58.8
Reflection 67.9
Parallax 74.3
48% 67 fps
MRender 68.1
Gravity 58.3
Splatting 55.6
49% 60.7 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 503
Write 323
Mixed 381
89% 403 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 50.1
4K Mixed 14.4
72% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 92.8
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 15.3
34% 70.6 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 97%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
136GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 117
Write 114
Mixed 113
86% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.72
4K Mixed 0.42
105% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C11D3/4GX KHX2400C11D3/4GX PSD38G16002 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.9% Average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 15.3
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 11.7
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,895 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $369
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback