Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H61-M LX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LX  (all builds)
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120308
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 17 '18 at 00:05
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$170
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.4% Good
Memory 90.7
1-Core 86.3
2-Core 136
65% 104 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 222
30% 222 Pts
64-Core 223
14% 223 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
Zotac(19DA 2199) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 384.94
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
3.43% Terrible
Lighting 4.27
Reflection 4.92
Parallax 3.34
4% 4.18 fps
MRender 5.43
Gravity 4.23
Splatting 3.09
3% 4.25 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.43%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
291GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 84.4
Write 92.6
Mixed 30.5
51% 69.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 0.93
4K Mixed 0.54
102% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 88%
Mass Storage Device 1TB
49GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 32.4
Write 28.1
Mixed 28.5
38% 29.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 0.57
4K Mixed 0.24
28% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-010.A00LF 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
28.9% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 8.3
26% 8.93 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 8.3
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M LX Builds (Compare 1,462 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $74
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback