Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-1755

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star CX700ND/CX70 0NF/CX70 0NE
MotherboardMSI MS-1755  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120914
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateMar 19 '18 at 19:16
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 94.2
2-Core 182
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 443
49% 387 Pts
64-Core 451
28% 451 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
MSI(1462 10B8) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.2875
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.78% Terrible
Lighting 4.13
Reflection 4.54
Parallax 2.91
3% 3.86 fps
MRender 5.71
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 7.83
4% 5.29 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.78%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$32
805GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX0P2D Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 106
Write 99.7
Mixed 98.7
76% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.31
4K Mixed 0.15
58% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 62%
Hitachi HTS545032B9SA02 320GB
170GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Read 29.7
Write 22
Mixed 23.8
31% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.02
4K Mixed 0.22
43% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1333KSU-2G 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
51% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.7
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 51%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-1755 Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-1755

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $455
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback