Lenovo 4236L48

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 4236L48  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 4236L48
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160905
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 22 '18 at 04:14
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2640M
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 91.3
1-Core 80.4
2-Core 158
67% 110 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 191
28% 206 Pts
64-Core 206
13% 206 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21CE) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
2.21% Terrible
Lighting 2.43
Reflection 3.65
Parallax 1.62
2% 2.57 fps
MRender 3.33
Gravity 1.33
Splatting 4.52
3% 3.06 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.21%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS128GSSD340 240GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 525ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.6% Average
Read 259
Write 223
Mixed 200
51% 227 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 54.4
4K Mixed 11.6
66% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 21.9
DQ Write 77.7
DQ Mixed 8.73
19% 36.1 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 96%
Sandisk U100 64GB
30GB free
Firmware: 10.56.00 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.5% Poor
Read 187
Write 156
Mixed 72.6
31% 139 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 11.9
4K Mixed 5.7
30% 9.46 MB/s
DQ Read 16.5
DQ Write 13.7
DQ Mixed 6.05
7% 12.1 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 46%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
735GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 93.8
Write 91.3
Mixed 48.5
58% 77.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.93
4K Mixed 0.23
81% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U4342-015.A00G 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
47.7% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 15.1
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 15
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $149Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback