Asrock Z68 Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z68 Pro3  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120507
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 27 '18 at 15:29
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Memory 84.5
1-Core 116
2-Core 234
81% 145 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 462
62% 463 Pts
64-Core 464
29% 464 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Nvidia(10DE 13C2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1543 MHz, MLim: 1877 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Lighting 69.2
Reflection 72
Parallax 65.5
56% 68.9 fps
MRender 73.1
Gravity 65.4
Splatting 58.2
53% 65.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
233GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 410
Mixed 422
99% 447 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 53.5
4K Mixed 38.2
126% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 293
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 117
125% 210 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 124%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 500
Write 254
Mixed 322
79% 359 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 39.8
4K Mixed 11.5
61% 22.6 MB/s
DQ Read 261
DQ Write 75.5
DQ Mixed 31.9
59% 123 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 129
Write 79.7
Mixed 71.3
70% 93.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 5.58
4K Mixed 0.57
350% 3.52 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 90%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 78.3
Write 55.1
Mixed 58.3
48% 63.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.67
4K Mixed 0.2
71% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Team--Elite-1333 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 04EF Team--Elite-1333 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.8% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 14.7
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 8.2
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z68 Pro3 Builds (Compare 377 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z68 Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $541
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback