Today's hottest deals

Asrock QC5000M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock QC5000M  (all builds)
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150507
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 30 '18 at 19:20
Run Duration467 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-5050 APU
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.55 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
35% Below average
Memory 57
1-Core 23.4
2-Core 46.2
30% 42.2 Pts
4-Core 76.8
8-Core 83.8
10% 80.3 Pts
64-Core 80.1
5% 80.1 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 35%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8330
ASRock(1849 9832) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.250.0.0
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.76% Terrible
Lighting 1.83
Reflection 4.27
Parallax 2.28
2% 2.79 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 3.35
2% 2.71 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.76%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 398
Write 183
Mixed 214
58% 265 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 11.9
4K Mixed 2.96
44% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 17.9
DQ Mixed 5.48
20% 46.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 85%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 16GB
13GB free, PID dd1a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
8.82% Terrible
Read 32.5
Write 9.05
Mixed 7.16
16% 16.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.65
4K Write 0.41
4K Mixed 0.36
40% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.82%
Great: 24%
Adata Classic C008 USB 2.0 16GB-$16
11GB free, PID c08a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
4.71% Terrible
Read 17.1
Write 4.18
Mixed 6.98
10% 9.42 MB/s
4K Read 5.39
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.004
21% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.71%
Great: 9%
Lexar JumpDrive P20 USB 3.0 32GB-$23
1GB free, PID a212
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 180
Write 70.6
Mixed 39.9
99% 96.9 MB/s
4K Read 9.43
4K Write 0.62
4K Mixed 0.39
69% 3.48 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17% Very poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 6
16% 5.67 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 4.7
12% 4.2 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical QC5000M Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock QC5000M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $288WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback