Inversenet FRONTIERPC

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	97.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

System	Inversenet FRONTIERPC (all builds)
Motherboard	ECS Z87H3-A4
Memory	14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20140429
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 24 '16 at 12:57
Run Duration	345 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$135 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	80.9% Excellent	Memory 88.2 1-Core 118 2-Core 236 83% 147 Pts	4-Core 397 8-Core 589 61% 493 Pts	64-Core 604 37% 604 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Nvidia(10DE 105F) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5906 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	Lighting 22.7 Reflection 16.9 Parallax 19.3 18% 19.6 fps	MRender 24.8 Gravity 18.2 Splatting 16.7 16% 19.9 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS500G32TND-3112A 500GB 315 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 329GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30060P00 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 166 166 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2 (64) Unknown 100 100 1165816 (AB) Unknown 253 253 0 (AC) Unknown 253 253 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 1 (AF) Unknown 253 253 0 (B0) Unknown 253 253 0 (B1) Unknown 100 99 1 (B2) Unknown 100 100 64 (B3) Unknown 100 100 743 (B4) Unknown 100 100 13145 (B5) Unknown 253 253 0 (B6) Unknown 253 253 0 (B7) Unknown 253 253 0 (BB) vendor-specific 253 253 0 (BC) Unknown 253 253 0 (BF) G-sense error rate 253 253 0 (C2) HDA temperature 27 25 5177371 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 253 253 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 253 253 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 1 (EB) Unknown 100 100 4 (F1) Unknown 100 100 4 (F2) Unknown 100 100 8 (FA) Read error retry rate 253 253 0	97.4% Outstanding	Read 455 Write 463 Mixed 257 87% 392 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 87.8 4K Mixed 40.3 140% 51.8 MB/s	DQ Read 32.4 DQ Write 307 DQ Mixed 0.59 51% 113 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 97.4% Great: 107%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 230 196 3491 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 863 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2294 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 431 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 1 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 194 194 19260 (C2) HDA temperature 122 106 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	71.3% Very good	Read 119 Write 129 Mixed 106 89% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.88 4K Mixed 0.29 96% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 83%
I-O DATA HDC-U 500GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 69GB free, PID 010f Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	18.2% Very poor	Read 37.6 Write 39 Mixed 11.6 35% 29.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.32 4K Mixed 0.4 61% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 19%
USB-HS SAMSUNG SP2514N 250GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 26GB free, PID 002a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	12.3% Very poor	Read 26.4 Write 21.4 Mixed 23.5 30% 23.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.38 56% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 13%
BUFFALO External HDD 1TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 17GB free, PID 01a9 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	17.9% Very poor	Read 38.5 Write 34.2 Mixed 9.48 32% 27.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.54 4K Mixed 0.3 64% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 18%
I-O DATA HDH-U 160GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 3GB free, PID 010a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12.1% Very poor	Read 25.6 Write 26.8 Mixed 14.7 28% 22.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 0.78 4K Mixed 0.28 38% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 13%
I-O DATA HDC-U 250GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 1GB free, PID 010f Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	16.1% Very poor	Read 34 Write 34.7 Mixed 25.6 40% 31.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 1.13 4K Mixed 0.41 54% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 240D38G628HYKLAFR 2x8GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	59% Above average	MC Read 21.4 MC Write 21.4 MC Mixed 17.3 57% 20 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 22.1 SC Mixed 21 57% 19.9 GB/s	Latency 69.3 58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FRONTIERPC Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Inversenet FRONTIERPC

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	2x
Core i3-4130Intel $41Bench 52%, 49,509 samples	2x
Core i5-4440Intel $99Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	1x

GPU
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	1x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	1x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	1x

RAM
M378B5173QH0-CK0 Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 M378B5173QH0-CK0 12GBSamsungBench 43%, 18 samples	2x
240D38G628HYKLAFR 2x8GBUnknownBench 53%, 13 samples	1x
CT51264BA160BJ.C8 2x4GBCrucialBench 51%, 2,504 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $135

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Inversenet FRONTIERPC

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Inversenet FRONTIERPC

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)