Today's hottest deals

Asus M5A97 PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 PLUS  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150423
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '18 at 23:22
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$85
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
66% Good
Memory 81.5
1-Core 73.5
2-Core 148
61% 101 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 455
44% 364 Pts
64-Core 451
28% 451 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
PNY(196E 11C3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32.4% Below average
Lighting 40.2
Reflection 30.5
Parallax 30.5
33% 33.7 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 40.2
Splatting 37.4
32% 38.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 100 240GB-$95
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM11.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
34.6% Below average
Read 479
Write 20.9
Mixed 158
47% 219 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 17.1
4K Mixed 0.44
36% 11.7 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 57.7
DQ Mixed 30.7
42% 78.5 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 83%
OCZ SOLID3 60GB
18GB free
Firmware: 2.15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 191
Write 61.8
Mixed 90.1
25% 114 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 55.8
4K Mixed 11.8
78% 29.9 MB/s
DQ Read 75.4
DQ Write 58.2
DQ Mixed 21.7
28% 51.8 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT8GX3M2A2000C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.8% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 7.7
24% 8.47 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 6.2
17% 6.1 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 PLUS Builds (Compare 127 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $204
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback