Asus X456URK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.86% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive98.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 93% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus X456URK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X456URK
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 04 '18 at 13:59
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 17%
CPU Throttled 93%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 88.5
1-Core 111
2-Core 183
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 310
41% 309 Pts
64-Core 309
19% 309 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 1320) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4550
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.86% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 8.85
Parallax 6.94
6% 7.69 fps
MRender 8.52
Gravity 6.27
Splatting 15
9% 9.92 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.86%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
391GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 527
Write 395
Mixed 427
100% 450 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 85
4K Mixed 28.7
143% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 95.5
112% 192 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 129%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
899GB free
Firmware: JA0OA560 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 92.3
Write 83.4
Mixed 94
68% 89.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.56
4K Mixed 0.19
70% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 57%
UFD 2.0 Silicon-Power16G 16GB
2GB free, PID 4200, sp 16
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
9.16% Terrible
Read 22.6
Write 10.7
Mixed 13.4
18% 15.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.41
4K Write 0.74
4K Mixed 0.44
60% 2.19 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 9.16%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 Samsung M471A5143EB0-CPB 8GB
2400, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
74.3% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 21.8
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 30.3
SC Mixed 23.8
68% 24 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X456URK Builds (Compare 295 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X456URK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $70
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback