Asus G75VX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemAsus G75VX  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G75VX
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20121031
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 04 '18 at 20:54
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 85.5
2-Core 155
65% 108 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 429
43% 350 Pts
64-Core 444
28% 444 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670MX
Asus(1043 10AD) 3GB
CLim: 601 MHz, MLim: 700 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 376.54
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Lighting 13.5
Reflection 12.4
Parallax 15.7
11% 13.9 fps
MRender 15.3
Gravity 15.1
Splatting 13
12% 14.5 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2011)-$75
630GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 93
Write 104
Mixed 95
73% 97.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 2.14
4K Mixed 0.18
75% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 63%
BMKT MemoRive 2GB
2GB free, PID 8628
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
6.2% Terrible
Read 20.5
Write 6.27
Mixed 9.55
13% 12.1 MB/s
4K Read 7.53
4K Write 0.03
4K Mixed 0.03
30% 2.53 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMSO4GX3M1A1333C9 Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 029E CMSO4GX3M1A1333C9 Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
48.2% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 14.8
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 15.8
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G75VX Builds (Compare 271 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G75VX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $420
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback