Lenovo 7052A7U

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 7052A7U  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 05 '18 at 06:00
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 92.3
1-Core 81.9
2-Core 164
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 328
44% 328 Pts
64-Core 330
20% 330 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
Asus(1043 83F8) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.1
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
28.6% Poor
Lighting 33.5
Reflection 32.5
Parallax 42.3
27% 36.1 fps
MRender 45.9
Gravity 38.1
Splatting 33
31% 39 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
T-64 64GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.74.00 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.7% Below average
Read 237
Write 101
Mixed 175
38% 171 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 23
4K Mixed 8.15
54% 17.2 MB/s
DQ Read 24.3
DQ Write 47.6
DQ Mixed 8.11
14% 26.7 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
447GB free
Firmware: KC65 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 130
Write 122
Mixed 108
90% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 1.02
4K Mixed 0.56
110% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 88%
Mass Storage Device 32GB
3GB free, PID 1212
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 21.7
Write 9.4
Mixed 11.1
16% 14.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.82
4K Write 1.32
4K Mixed 0.4
73% 1.85 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMR5040ED58E9W1600 Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
52.9% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 16.7
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 7052A7U Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 7052A7U

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $289
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback