HP Z400 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	58.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	15GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 15GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	HP Z400 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0B4Ch
Memory	11.2 GB free of 15.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110311
Uptime	9.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 06 '18 at 16:17
Run Duration	170 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	16%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W3520-$230 6,508 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	64% Good	Memory 86.7 1-Core 69.7 2-Core 141 61% 99 Pts	4-Core 240 8-Core 255 33% 247 Pts	64-Core 267 16% 267 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Zotac(19DA 1438) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	58.7% Above average	Lighting 73.1 Reflection 75.3 Parallax 65.3 60% 71.3 fps	MRender 69.5 Gravity 68.3 Splatting 70.7 57% 69.5 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF300000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 192 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 67 (A5) Unknown 100 100 343 (A6) Unknown 100 100 4 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 12 (A9) Unknown 100 100 226 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 4 (AE) Unknown 100 100 3 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 61 46 197570068519 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 420912037986 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 863 (EA) Unknown 100 100 2613 (F1) Unknown 100 100 1055 (F2) Unknown 100 100 659 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	25.8% Poor	Read 251 Write 88 Mixed 9.11 25% 116 MB/s	4K Read 13.2 4K Write 10.2 4K Mixed 2.38 28% 8.59 MB/s	DQ Read 88.8 DQ Write 23.5 DQ Mixed 3.03 16% 38.4 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$40 52,322 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 362GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 136 128 4200 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1612 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 6009 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1322 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 182 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 174 174 80610 (C2) HDA temperature 110 101 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	78.3% Very good	Read 134 Write 139 Mixed 135 102% 136 MB/s	4K Read 1.03 4K Write 2.43 4K Mixed 0.22 112% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 78.3% Great: 87%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 5,895 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 112GB free, PID a00c Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Read 28.6 Write 28.1 Mixed 18.8 31% 25.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.23 4K Write 0.61 4K Mixed 0.11 25% 0.32 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:01 4F JM1333KLN-4G ID:80 2C 8KTF51264AZ-1G6E1 ID:80 AD HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT112U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT112U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT112U7TFR8C-H9 49GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1333, 1600, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 1024, 1024, 1024, 34816 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	34.5% Below average	MC Read 12.2 MC Write 11 MC Mixed 11.1 33% 11.4 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 9.5 SC Mixed 10.1 27% 9.37 GB/s	Latency 70.7 56% 70.7 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,334 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP Z400 Workstation

CPU
Xeon W3520Intel $230Bench 63%, 6,508 samples	569x
Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples	537x
Xeon W3565IntelBench 67%, 7,121 samples	490x

GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	273x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	157x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	138x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	136x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	73x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	66x

RAM
ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 42GBUnknownBench 37%, 128 samples	22x
ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 46GBUnknownBench 45%, 108 samples	18x
ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 46GBUnknownBench 46%, 280 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $258

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16