Gigabyte GA-F2A78M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.03% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive30.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A78M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '16 at 17:35
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7870K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Memory 77.1
1-Core 72.1
2-Core 138
58% 95.7 Pts
4-Core 211
8-Core 212
28% 211 Pts
64-Core 212
13% 212 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.502.1013.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
9.03% Terrible
Lighting 11.1
Reflection 11
Parallax 14.2
9% 12.1 fps
MRender 9.48
Gravity 11.7
Splatting 11.3
9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 9.03%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ AGILITY3 60GB
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
30.7% Below average
Read 194
Write 55.4
Mixed 75.4
24% 108 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 34.3
4K Mixed 10
58% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 68
DQ Write 47.7
DQ Mixed 21.4
26% 45.7 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 51%
WL150GLSA16100 150GB
140GB free
Firmware: 04.04V03 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 117
Write 121
Mixed 99
84% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.86
4K Write 2.62
4K Mixed 0.66
158% 1.38 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 2132 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
45.5% Average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 19.4
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 13.9
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 86
46% 86 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A78M-D3H Builds (Compare 127 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A78M-D3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $124
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback