HP Pavilion Notebook

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemHP Pavilion Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 80B9
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20160310
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 10 '18 at 13:16
Run Duration374 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
38.4% Below average
Memory 54.2
1-Core 37.5
2-Core 75.5
35% 55.7 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 123
18% 128 Pts
64-Core 136
8% 136 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5
HP(103C 80B9) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.502.1007.0
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.35% Terrible
Lighting 2.73
Reflection 5.65
Parallax 3.62
2% 4 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 3.7
3% 3.1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.35%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
826GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JA0OA710 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 88.1
Write 78.6
Mixed 91.4
65% 86.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.17
57% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 57%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 8GB
4GB free, PID 0727
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.22% Terrible
Read 12.7
Write 3.53
Mixed 3.22
6% 6.48 MB/s
4K Read 2.42
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.009
10% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.22%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP687515-H66-MCN 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.6% Very poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 6.7
19% 6.57 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6.8
17% 5.87 GB/s
Latency 146
27% 146 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Notebook Builds (Compare 8,919 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback