Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	34.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	227% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X299 MARK 2 (all builds)
Memory	122.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	Цвета: 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170906
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 13 '18 at 06:34
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7800X-$216 22,334 User benchmarks, average bench 78% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	85.6% Excellent	Memory 76.1 1-Core 128 2-Core 255 83% 153 Pts	4-Core 510 8-Core 853 83% 682 Pts	64-Core 1,042 64% 1,042 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 85.6% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	34.3% Below average	Lighting 43.4 Reflection 32.5 Parallax 39.3 35% 38.4 fps	MRender 38.6 Gravity 41.3 Splatting 38.4 32% 39.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 214GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	227% Outstanding	Read 1,795 Write 1,698 Mixed 1,675 385% 1,723 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 39.7 4K Mixed 33.6 99% 32.1 MB/s	DQ Read 547 DQ Write 350 DQ Mixed 207 219% 368 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 227% Great: 353%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 168GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 997 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 539 (B1) Unknown 99 99 3 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 52 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 90 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4506138983	83.9% Excellent	Read 501 Write 407 Mixed 423 99% 444 MB/s	4K Read 24.6 4K Write 29.2 4K Mixed 26.2 86% 26.6 MB/s	DQ Read 284 DQ Write 265 DQ Mixed 112 128% 220 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 134%
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215 19,372 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 12GB free Firmware: 1.5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 6 0 6 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 11503 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3307 (E8) Unknown 100 100 15678968300 (E9) Unknown 97 0 97	74.2% Very good	Read 456 Write 374 Mixed 384 90% 405 MB/s	4K Read 15.7 4K Write 34.7 4K Mixed 24.5 74% 24.9 MB/s	DQ Read 238 DQ Write 203 DQ Mixed 92 104% 178 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS16G4D240FSB.16FBD BLS16G4D240FSE.16FBD BLS16G4D240FSB.16FBD BLS16G4D240FSE.16FBD BLS16G4D240FSB.16FBD BLS16G4D240FSE.16FBD BLS16G4D240FSB.16FBD BLS16G4D240FSE.16FBD 128GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	92.1% Outstanding	MC Read 25.2 MC Write 54.2 MC Mixed 30 104% 36.5 GB/s	SC Read 7.6 SC Write 24 SC Mixed 9.8 39% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 88.2 45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 92% ↑ This bench: 92.1% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,659 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 100%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 94%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

CPU
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	497x
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	261x
Core i7-7740XIntel $240Bench 87%, 5,094 samples	149x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	169x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	152x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	93x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $81Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	79x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	61x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	56x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	35x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	31x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $782

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16