Today's hottest deals

NEC Express5800/T110c [N8100-1699]

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.62% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive36.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemNEC Express5800/T110c [N8100-1699]  (all builds)
MotherboardGIGABYTE 6FXSV00R-MB
Memory0.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101124
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateApr 16 '18 at 00:30
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3430
CPU#1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
37.8% Below average
Memory 48.3
1-Core 57.5
2-Core 109
41% 71.5 Pts
4-Core 155
8-Core 178
22% 166 Pts
64-Core 177
11% 177 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 745 (OEM)-$60
Nvidia(10DE 1065) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Relative performance (0th percentile)
5.62% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 10.6
Parallax 8.38
4% 8 fps
MRender 9.29
Gravity 9.93
Splatting 11.7
9% 10.3 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 5.62%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 120GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0111A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.3% Below average
Read 219
Write 161
Mixed 183
42% 187 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 50.2
4K Mixed 1.96
56% 23.4 MB/s
DQ Read 19.9
DQ Write 92.8
DQ Mixed 1.95
17% 38.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 81%
Seagate ST1000DM003-9YN162 501GB
228GB free
Firmware: CC82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
94.5% Outstanding
Read 152
Write 177
Mixed 132
115% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.81
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.22
87% 0.85 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TS512MLK72V3N 2x4GB
2 of 6 slots used
8GB DIMM 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.2% Very poor
MC Read 5.6
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 6.1
17% 6.03 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 5.6
17% 5.87 GB/s
Latency 167
24% 167 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback