Today's hottest deals

Quanta TW9/SW9

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemQuanta TW9/SW9  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel Base Board Product Name
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 16 '18 at 06:57
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 370-$167
CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Memory 63.7
1-Core 49.2
2-Core 61
39% 58 Pts
4-Core 54.5
8-Core 75.8
8% 65.2 Pts
64-Core 75.8
5% 75.8 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Quanta(152D 0809) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2993
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.85% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.15
Parallax 0.84
1% 0.97 fps
MRender 1.38
Gravity 0.67
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.25 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.85%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$15
257GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 59.2
Write 53.9
Mixed 15.6
31% 42.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.21
4K Mixed 0.28
72% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ21UE8BDS0-AE-F M471B5673FH0-CF8 4GB
1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.3% Very poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.17 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6
17% 6 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TW9/SW9 Builds (Compare 117 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Quanta TW9/SW9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $215
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback