Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1850
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 17 '18 at 00:34
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5500B APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
41.7% Average
Memory 64.4
1-Core 45.5
2-Core 55.3
38% 55.1 Pts
4-Core 110
8-Core 127
15% 118 Pts
64-Core 138
9% 138 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7560D
HP(103C 1850) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
4.43% Terrible
Lighting 5.07
Reflection 7.62
Parallax 4.69
4% 5.79 fps
MRender 5.38
Gravity 3.97
Splatting 8.17
5% 5.84 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.43%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team L5 lite 60GB SSD
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20151027 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 393
Write 79.6
Mixed 91
40% 188 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 25.6
4K Mixed 2.33
38% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 94.9
DQ Write 43.4
DQ Mixed 16.7
26% 51.7 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 50%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40
521GB free
Firmware: AX001U Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 87.9
Write 86.1
Mixed 78.5
63% 84.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.16
60% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
U 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
29.3% Poor
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 9.5
30% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 9.1
20% 7.17 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 6305 SFF Builds (Compare 494 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback