Acer G540 M2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics62.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive20.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer G540 M2  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer G540 M2
Memory46 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100630
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 21 '18 at 14:23
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650
CPU2, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
60% Good
Memory 66.3
1-Core 74.1
2-Core 150
56% 96.9 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 474
47% 382 Pts
64-Core 1,053
65% 1,053 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 387.92
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.9% Good
Lighting 80
Reflection 76
Parallax 73.7
65% 76.6 fps
MRender 71.1
Gravity 72.2
Splatting 71
58% 71.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNC256GBSJ 256GB
140GB free
Firmware: CJTA0202 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
29.3% Poor
Read 187
Write 161
Mixed 142
36% 164 MB/s
4K Read 9.09
4K Write 18.8
4K Mixed 7.58
34% 11.8 MB/s
DQ Read 14.1
DQ Write 70.5
DQ Mixed 12.9
18% 32.5 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 49%
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE300000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.8% Poor
Read 245
Write 59
Mixed 65.3
26% 123 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 7.44
4K Mixed 3.18
24% 7.12 MB/s
DQ Read 11.6
DQ Write 9.11
DQ Mixed 5.07
5% 8.61 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 53%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
931GB free
Firmware: CC68 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 117
Write 99
Mixed 97.1
78% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.59
4K Mixed 0.58
110% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
930GB free
Firmware: CC44 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 114
Write 105
Mixed 99.6
80% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.81
4K Write 1.45
4K Mixed 0.47
113% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 68%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
882GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 133
Write 120
Mixed 112
91% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 2.17
4K Mixed 0.39
112% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B5170FH0-YH9 12x4GB
12 of 12 slots used
48GB DIMM 15h Reserved 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.9% Above average
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 21.4
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 10
28% 9.77 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback