Asrock Z77 Extreme4-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics22% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4-M  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130117
Uptime6 Days
Run DateApr 22 '18 at 11:40
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Memory 79.9
1-Core 74.3
2-Core 157
61% 104 Pts
4-Core 229
8-Core 244
31% 236 Pts
64-Core 275
17% 275 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22% Poor
Lighting 25.6
Reflection 24.6
Parallax 32.4
21% 27.5 fps
MRender 34.3
Gravity 30.6
Splatting 26
24% 30.3 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$47
585GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 113
Write 114
Mixed 72.8
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.86
4K Write 2.02
4K Mixed 0.18
93% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 84%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA632 1TB-$105
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP4OA41A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 80.5
Write 89.5
Mixed 92.6
66% 87.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.04
4K Mixed 0.29
67% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.4% Poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 6.6
20% 7 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 6.3
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4-M Builds (Compare 230 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4-M - $141

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $455
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback