Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	0.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	29.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140403
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Apr 28 '18 at 22:27
Run Duration	265 Seconds
Run User	COL-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$127 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	66.3% Good	Memory 82.5 1-Core 73.5 2-Core 146 61% 101 Pts	4-Core 271 8-Core 439 44% 355 Pts	64-Core 440 27% 440 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 68%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
AMD Radeon X300/X550/X1050 Series Device(14CD 0381) 64MB Driver: atiumdag Ver. 8.56.1.16 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Lighting 0.77 Reflection 0.27 1% 0.52 fps

Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS 18,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(0000 0000) 512MB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8593 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.54% Terrible	Lighting 0.6 Reflection 0.77 Parallax 0.31 0% 0.56 fps	MRender 1.14 Gravity 0.43 Splatting 0.78 1% 0.79 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.54% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU 650 120GB 342 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 29GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q083 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 486 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 226 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 100 (A3) Unknown 100 100 24 (A4) Unknown 100 100 22506 (A5) Unknown 100 100 52 (A6) Unknown 100 100 18 (A7) Unknown 100 100 43 (A8) Unknown 100 100 7000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 61 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 1 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 61037 (F2) Unknown 100 100 38420 (F5) Unknown 100 100 37021	75.1% Very good	Read 460 Write 412 Mixed 448 98% 440 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 82.8 4K Mixed 5.17 85% 37 MB/s	DQ Read 134 DQ Write 230 DQ Mixed 5.69 54% 123 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 815GB free Firmware: HP34 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 91 224031592 (03) Spinup time 96 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9892 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 312 (07) Seek error rate 70 60 11906222 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 6513 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1815 (B4) Unknown 100 100 874955662 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 933 (BC) Unknown 100 99 34360262693 (BD) vendor-specific 93 93 7 (BE) vendor-specific 74 57 454098970 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 97 97 7190 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 82 82 36066 (C2) HDA temperature 26 43 64424509466 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 312 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 99 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 8 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 71	86.3% Excellent	Read 192 Write 109 Mixed 159 116% 153 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.41 4K Mixed 0.3 83% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$90 81,608 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 518GB free Firmware: CC32 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 77 304 (03) Spinup time 93 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10637 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 80 60 107281866 (09) Power-on hours count 81 81 17472 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 7107 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 65535 (BC) Unknown 100 91 51540394093 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 52 471007258 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1927 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 4714 (C2) HDA temperature 26 48 68719476762 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 36 9 304 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 97 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 97 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 199 284 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -112940460010308 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3446481273 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2591691186	53.2% Above average	Read 103 Write 82.1 Mixed 66 62% 83.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 0.72 4K Mixed 0.63 99% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 75%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB 22,636 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 375GB free Firmware: JKAO Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 132 132 105 (03) Spinup time 119 119 51579388510 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3829 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 121 121 35 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 41333 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1742 (C0) Power-off retract count 97 97 3841 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 3841 (C2) HDA temperature 214 214 210454446108 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	43.3% Average	Read 73.8 Write 77.1 Mixed 81.3 58% 77.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.23 4K Mixed 0.31 78% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 68%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 134GB 53 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 3GB free, PID fa05 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	10.6% Very poor	Read 29.5 Write 27.9 Mixed 5.59 24% 21 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 0.009 4K Mixed 0.15 8% 0.29 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73BH0-CK0 Corsair CML8GX3M1A1600C10 M378B1G73BH0-CK0 M378B1G73BH0-CK0 32GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	43.4% Average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 14.4 MC Mixed 14.5 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 8.4 SC Mixed 12.9 30% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 76 53% 76 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 770 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

CPU
FX-8350AMD $127Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	386x
FX-8320AMD $153Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	103x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	87x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	44x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	44x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	31x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	27x
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
A400 480GBKingston $35Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	21x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	44x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	11x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $643

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350