Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-7TESM

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	9.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	45.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-7TESM (all builds)
Memory	6.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110808
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 03 '18 at 23:32
Run Duration	116 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5667 365 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPU1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	77% Very good	Memory 94.4 1-Core 82 2-Core 170 69% 115 Pts	4-Core 322 8-Core 546 53% 434 Pts	64-Core 787 49% 787 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 M360 1,374 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Device(1B0A 90F4) ≥ 4GB Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.3.1 Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	9.39% Terrible	Lighting 11.3 Reflection 12.3 Parallax 13.5 9% 12.4 fps	MRender 10.6 Gravity 9.4 Splatting 14.6 10% 11.5 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.39% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Dell VIRTUAL DISK 177GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 140GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1028 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	45.8% Average	Read 332 Write 277 Mixed 305 68% 305 MB/s	4K Read 15.7 4K Write 23.9 4K Mixed 4.78 42% 14.8 MB/s	DQ Read 71.2 DQ Write 93.3 DQ Mixed 9.44 27% 58 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 47%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 111 99 35236656 (03) Spinup time 91 88 0 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10549 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 54 50 163218756372 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 13396 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 91 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1260 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 38655295498 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 41 2835301400613 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 9084 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 88 88 24286 (C2) HDA temperature 37 59 64424509477 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 10075993282339 (F1) Unknown 100 253 9494330978 (F2) Unknown 100 253 148060749848	84.8% Excellent	Read 156 Write 140 Mixed 77 92% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.3 79% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 84.8% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 18JSF25672AY-1G4D1 4x2GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 4 of 18 slots used 8GB DIMM 15h Reserved 1333 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	45% Average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 14.5 45% 15.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 9.6 28% 9.73 GB/s	Latency 58.8 68% 58.8 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback