Acer Aspire ES1-524

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire ES1-524  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Tricera_BS
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170705
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 05 '18 at 07:38
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 87%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E2-9010 APU (2016 M.SR)
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Memory 20.6
1-Core 25.9
2-Core 35.5
17% 27.3 Pts
4-Core 34.8
8-Core 39.1
5% 36.9 Pts
64-Core 45.5
3% 45.5 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
Acer(1025 1087) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.101.2901.0
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.95% Terrible
Lighting 2.17
Reflection 5.58
Parallax 2.84
2% 3.53 fps
MRender 2.86
Gravity 1.83
Splatting 3.52
2% 2.74 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.95%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$34
318GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX1P5J Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
47% Average
Read 84.4
Write 79.5
Mixed 81.2
62% 81.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.29
4K Write 0.98
4K Mixed 0.11
42% 0.46 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KBGR/4G 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
MC Read 6.2
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 5.6
17% 5.8 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 4.7
13% 4.7 GB/s
Latency 316
13% 316 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire ES1-524 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire ES1-524

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 5% - Terrible Total price: $150
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback