Supermicro Super Server

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemSupermicro Super Server  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X11SSL-F
Memory14.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20171006
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 06 '18 at 01:07
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v6
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 97.5
1-Core 33.7
2-Core 75.7
49% 69 Pts
4-Core 241
8-Core 695
52% 468 Pts
64-Core 696
43% 696 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 89%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
931GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 126
Write 125
Mixed 110
90% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.97
4K Write 1.83
4K Mixed 0.49
129% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 72%
Great: 76%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$32
919GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01V01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 152
Write 127
Mixed 123
101% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.04
4K Write 2.36
4K Mixed 0.51
144% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965669-019.A00G 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
48.2% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 13
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 48.3
83% 48.3 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Super Server Builds (Compare 732 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: Supermicro Super Server

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $596
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback