Acer Aspire E1-571G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire E1-571G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer EA50_HC_CR
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130311
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 11 '16 at 01:26
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3632QM
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 84.1
2-Core 165
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 387
45% 348 Pts
64-Core 406
25% 406 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Acer(1025 064B) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2653
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.83% Terrible
Lighting 3.93
Reflection 5.08
Parallax 2.91
3% 3.97 fps
MRender 5.86
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 9.13
5% 5.78 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.83%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 476
Write 259
Mixed 270
74% 335 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 37.9
4K Mixed 22.4
93% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 299
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 40.8
82% 170 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 91%
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$55
153GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 85.7
Write 84.6
Mixed 66
59% 78.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 1.44
4K Mixed 0.15
58% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT351S6CFR8C-PB Kingston HP16D3LS1KBG/4G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
50% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 16.6
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 16.3
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 50%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E1-571G Builds (Compare 466 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E1-571G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $125
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback