ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI MS-16J9

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	32.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	160% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Micro-Star GL62M 7REX
Motherboard	MSI MS-16J9 (all builds)
Memory	4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171024
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 09 '18 at 08:54
Run Duration	109 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	78.6% Very good	Memory 89.7 1-Core 115 2-Core 210 80% 138 Pts	4-Core 365 8-Core 598 59% 481 Pts	64-Core 604 37% 604 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile) 105,856 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 11C8) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8816 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	32.9% Below average	Lighting 42.1 Reflection 31.3 Parallax 36.4 34% 36.6 fps	MRender 36.6 Gravity 39.1 Splatting 35.1 30% 36.9 fps
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB 11,069 User benchmarks, average bench 176% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXB7401Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	160% Outstanding	Read 1,246 Write 609 Mixed 699 187% 851 MB/s	4K Read 54.1 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 43.3 194% 67.9 MB/s	DQ Read 406 DQ Write 262 DQ Mixed 143 158% 271 MB/s
Poor: 108% ↑ This bench: 160% Great: 234%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 845GB free Firmware: JB0OA3U0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 119 119 94489280514 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1047 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 702 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 311 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 6 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 3621 (C2) HDA temperature 162 162 206159740965 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	70% Good	Read 131 Write 113 Mixed 118 91% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.67 4K Mixed 0.2 77% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5143EB1-CRC 017A 78.B2GF7.4022B 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	75.5% Very good	MC Read 28.2 MC Write 28.8 MC Mixed 22.6 76% 26.5 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 29.3 SC Mixed 24.5 68% 23.6 GB/s	Latency 67.7 59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 75%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical MS-16J9 Builds (Compare 3,788 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16J9

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	2,482x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	1,306x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	2,259x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	1,024x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	504x

SSD
THNSNJ256G8NY 256GBToshibaBench 76%, 12,683 samples	211x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GBSamsungBench 176%, 11,069 samples	127x
THNSNJ128G8NY 128GBToshibaBench 73%, 7,789 samples	110x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	765x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	312x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	215x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback