Today's hottest deals

Toshiba Satellite C75D-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemToshiba Satellite C75D-A  (all builds)
MotherboardAMD Larne
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130912
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateMar 13 '16 at 00:46
Run Duration103 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-5200 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Memory 52.5
1-Core 30.7
2-Core 56.4
31% 46.5 Pts
4-Core 107
8-Core 73.4
13% 90.2 Pts
64-Core 92.6
6% 92.6 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8400-R3
Toshiba(1179 FA85) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.0
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
1.83% Terrible
Lighting 2.03
Reflection 4.27
Parallax 2.34
2% 2.88 fps
MRender 2.67
Gravity 1.93
Splatting 3.13
2% 2.58 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.83%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$31
276GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11.01A11 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
31.5% Below average
Read 53.2
Write 56.1
Mixed 56.9
42% 55.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.87
4K Mixed 0.34
90% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair SODIM DDR3 1600 C11 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1334 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.3% Very poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 6.2
17% 5.9 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 5.9
12% 4.33 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite C75D-A Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C75D-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback