Today's hottest deals

Intel X79 INTEL(INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardIntel X79 INTEL(INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 13 '18 at 18:05
Run Duration88 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1607 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
65.7% Good
Memory 77.4
1-Core 79.4
2-Core 158
62% 105 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 318
42% 315 Pts
64-Core 312
19% 312 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203
Asus(1043 042F) 2GB
CLim: 1010 MHz, MLim: 1210 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Lighting 35.5
Reflection 32
Parallax 43.2
29% 36.9 fps
MRender 27
Gravity 30
Splatting 37.5
26% 31.5 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
912GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC61 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 175
Mixed 168
134% 179 MB/s
4K Read 0.83
4K Write 1.85
4K Mixed 0.21
92% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 106%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Dimm2_Manufacturer Dimm6_Manufacturer 8GB
1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.9% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 13.3
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 9.6
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 85.4
47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 INTEL(INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel X79 INTEL(INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $337WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback