Today's hottest deals

Asus K30BF_M32BF_A_F_K31BF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive63% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAsus K30BF_M32BF_A_F_K31BF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K30BF_M32BF_A_F_K31BF
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150731
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 14 '18 at 03:57
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6700 APU (2013 D.Ri)-$130
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61.5% Good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 72.9
2-Core 139
60% 98.8 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 221
30% 224 Pts
64-Core 223
14% 223 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 745 (OEM)-$60
Nvidia(10DE 1065) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1159 MHz, MLim: 492 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 397.31
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 9% Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS13 11 120GB SSD
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS13 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
63% Good
Read 267
Write 251
Mixed 261
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 74.7
4K Mixed 13.9
103% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 60.9
75% 132 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 63%
Great: 90%
WD Purple Surveillance 3TB (2017)-$90
1TB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 117
Write 117
Mixed 110
86% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 1.99
4K Mixed 0.18
81% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston K66GKY-ETB 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.9% Below average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 11.4
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 10.3
26% 8.93 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K30BF_M32BF_A_F_K31BF Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K30BF_M32BF_A_F_K31BF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $155
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback