HP Compaq 8000 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.22% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive35.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 8000 Elite CMT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3647h
Memory1.5 GB free of 4.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091022
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateMay 15 '18 at 20:44
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
43.2% Average
Memory 69.3
1-Core 26.9
2-Core 53.8
35% 50 Pts
4-Core 102
8-Core 102
14% 102 Pts
64-Core 98.2
6% 98.2 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Gigabyte(1458 3693) 2GB
CLim: 1136 MHz, MLim: 1374 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
6.22% Terrible
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 8.38
Parallax 10.8
6% 8.88 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 8.9
Splatting 9.04
6% 7.62 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.22%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.3% Below average
Read 181
Write 164
Mixed 171
38% 172 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 27.7
4K Mixed 4.59
54% 18.2 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 6.7
DQ Mixed 4.16
18% 43.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HDS721032CLA362 320GB-$150
228GB free
Firmware: JPFOA3BF Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 69.7
Write 54.8
Mixed 66.9
48% 63.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 1.07
4K Mixed 0.31
68% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 50%
Samsung HD160JJ/P 160GB-$40
126GB free
Firmware: ZM100-46 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
34% Below average
Read 57.3
Write 60.9
Mixed 57.8
44% 58.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 1.41
4K Mixed 0.38
93% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 34%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:02 FE EBJ10UE8BDF0-DJ-F ID:80 CE M378B2873EH1-CH9 ID:02 FE EBJ10UE8BDF0-DJ-F ID:80 CE M378B2873EH1-CH9 40GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 36864 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.3
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 4.5
13% 4.67 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 4.3
13% 4.53 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8000 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 323 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8000 Elite CMT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $178
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback