Today's hottest deals

Supermicro X9DAi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics22.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro X9DAi  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DAi
Memory29.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130805
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 14 '16 at 20:58
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
61.2% Good
Memory 58.8
1-Core 88.7
2-Core 173
59% 107 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 681
60% 511 Pts
64-Core 1,337
83% 1,337 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4200-$820
HP(103C 1096) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5330
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Lighting 25.8
Reflection 26.9
Parallax 33
21% 28.6 fps
MRender 38.4
Gravity 25.6
Splatting 27.1
24% 30.4 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
376GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 478
Write 332
Mixed 334
84% 381 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 55.7
4K Mixed 26.4
116% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 87.5
93% 157 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 126%
WD Purple 3TB (2014)-$80
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 127
Write 131
Mixed 115
93% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 2.45
4K Mixed 0.27
101% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965433-403.A 4x8GB
4 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.6% Average
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 14.8
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 6.6
21% 7.43 GB/s
Latency 131
30% 131 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9DAi Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier

System: Supermicro X9DAi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $247
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback