Asus G73Sw

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.87% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive37.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus G73Sw  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G73Sw
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110210
Uptime7 Days
Run DateMay 17 '18 at 12:47
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$230
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 73.2
2-Core 141
60% 98.5 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 346
37% 296 Pts
64-Core 347
22% 347 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460M
Asus(1043 2048) 1GB
CLim: 675 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
6.87% Terrible
Lighting 8.1
Reflection 9.54
Parallax 6.66
7% 8.1 fps
MRender 9.86
Gravity 8.43
Splatting 8.91
7% 9.07 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.87%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial C300-MTFDDAK128MAG 128GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0007 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 353
Write 138
Mixed 197
50% 229 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 36.2
4K Mixed 3.71
48% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 19
DQ Write 39.5
DQ Mixed 3.67
10% 20.7 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 58%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$70
408GB free
Firmware: 0002SDM1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 93
Write 95
Mixed 83.2
68% 90.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 0.63
4K Mixed 0.2
60% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5773CHS-CH9 80AD HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 80AD HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 80CE M471B5773CHS-CH9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 8192, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.8% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 12.2
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 11.7
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G73Sw Builds (Compare 160 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G73Sw

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $230
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback