ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-7TESM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	10.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-7TESM (all builds)
Memory	6.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110808
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 17 '18 at 12:52
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5667 365 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPU1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	77.4% Very good	Memory 93.3 1-Core 82.4 2-Core 171 69% 116 Pts	4-Core 333 8-Core 494 51% 413 Pts	64-Core 788 49% 788 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 M360 1,374 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Device(1B0A 90F4) ≥ 4GB Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.4.1 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	10.5% Very poor	Lighting 12.3 Reflection 15.8 Parallax 15.2 10% 14.5 fps	MRender 13.2 Gravity 10.3 Splatting 17.3 12% 13.6 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
LSI Logical Volume 177GB 134GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3000 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 230075984 (03) Spinup time 92 88 0 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10611 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 54 50 163218914423 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 13677 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 91 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1296 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 38655295498 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 41 2835267518499 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 9090 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 87 87 26028 (C2) HDA temperature 35 59 64424509475 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -37396280240169 (F1) Unknown 100 253 9530510759 (F2) Unknown 100 253 148178448915	84.1% Excellent	Read 136 Write 157 Mixed 134 107% 142 MB/s	4K Read 0.81 4K Write 1.05 4K Mixed 0.3 87% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 84.1% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 18JSF25672AY-1G4D1 2C80 18JSF25672AY-1G4D1 2C80 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F1 2C80 18JSF25672AY-1G4D1 2C80 18JSF25672AY-1G4D1 2C80 18JSF25672AY-1G4D1 12GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	55.4% Above average	MC Read 23.5 MC Write 17.1 MC Mixed 20.4 58% 20.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 9.6 28% 9.93 GB/s	Latency 61.4 65% 61.4 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback