MSI A75MA-P35 (MS-7697)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7697
MotherboardMSI A75MA-P35 (MS-7697)  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110901
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 15 '16 at 20:14
Run Duration325 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-3400 APU-$80
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Memory 53.2
1-Core 41
2-Core 76.9
36% 57 Pts
4-Core 69.5
8-Core 63.5
9% 66.5 Pts
64-Core 73.7
5% 73.7 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6410D
MSI(1462 7697) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.881.0.0
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
1.99% Terrible
Lighting 2.17
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 1.94
2% 2.53 fps
MRender 3.48
Gravity 1.63
Splatting 3.61
2% 2.91 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.99%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 24% Great: 69%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
28GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
8.64% Terrible
Read 34.6
Write 11.1
Mixed 9.18
18% 18.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.63
4K Write 0.03
4K Mixed 0.03
19% 1.56 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.64%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BD160BJ.M8F Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.4% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 9
25% 8.73 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6.1
16% 5.63 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A75MA-P35 (MS-7697) Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI A75MA-P35 (MS-7697)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Average Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback