Lenovo 20201

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20201  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO INVALID
Memory3.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130712
Uptime6 Days
Run DateMay 20 '18 at 17:19
Run Duration272 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61% Good
Memory 88
1-Core 82.7
2-Core 137
64% 103 Pts
4-Core 199
8-Core 200
27% 200 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 61%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3904) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3277
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
2.2% Terrible
Lighting 2.43
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 1.62
2% 2.85 fps
MRender 3.29
Gravity 1.33
Splatting 4.52
3% 3.05 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.2%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TD128HAFV-000L1 128GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT05L0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 477
Write 131
Mixed 186
57% 265 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 49.2
4K Mixed 10
70% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 29.1
64% 134 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 71%
Mass Storage Device 750GB
626GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
4.33% Terrible
Read 11.3
Write 5.31
Mixed 5.78
8% 7.46 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 0.47
4K Mixed 0.11
21% 0.31 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.33%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3160ED58E9W1600 RMT3150ED58E8W1600 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.9% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 13.2
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 12.5
SC Mixed 13.7
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20201 Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20201

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $128
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback